View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
larryp
Joined: 24 Jan 2012 Posts: 252 Location: eden prairie mn
|
Link Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2016 12:44 am Post subject: 4 K or not? |
|
|
Looking for a tv for the bedroom, 55" or so.
Is it worth getting a 4 k model over a 1080p? I'll be watching Roku box & dvd's.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ecrabb Forum Moderator
Joined: 13 Mar 2006 Posts: 15909 Location: Utah
TV/Projector: JVC RS40, Epson 5010
|
Link Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2016 4:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Probably not, though in that size, it's getting harder to find 1080p sets, and the 4K set pricing is coming way down. What's your viewing distance in the bedroom, Larry? Eyes to screen.
SC
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
larryp
Joined: 24 Jan 2012 Posts: 252 Location: eden prairie mn
|
Link Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2016 9:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
About 9-12 ft -depends on how the room is arranged
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ecrabb Forum Moderator
Joined: 13 Mar 2006 Posts: 15909 Location: Utah
TV/Projector: JVC RS40, Epson 5010
|
Link Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2016 10:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ah, OK. That's far enough away you you'll gain very little to no benefit from 4K. You should just focus on other aspects of picture quality, the feature set you want, and the price.
If want a little more detail, look here:
http://carltonbale.com/does-4k-resolution-matter/
It's not gospel, and people frequently use his charts to try to suggest that almost nobody can benefit from 4K (which isn't true), but looking at it you can see that at nine feet or so, you probably won't be able to tell much (if any) difference between a 1080p and 4K display - if they're sitting side by side. At 12 feet, forget it - they'll look 100% identical.
SC
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
larryp
Joined: 24 Jan 2012 Posts: 252 Location: eden prairie mn
|
Link Posted: Tue Apr 26, 2016 12:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks, I've seen some good prices on 1080 sets. I'll probably get one. I'll be checking out Costco
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|