View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Nashou66
Joined: 12 Jan 2007 Posts: 16171 Location: West Seneca NY
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
mp20748
Joined: 12 Sep 2006 Posts: 5681 Location: Maryland
TV/Projector: 9500LC Ultra / Super 02 and 03 VIM
|
Link Posted: Wed Mar 25, 2015 12:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Man, the contributions to this tread has been great stuff... stay with it fellas..
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
barclay66
Joined: 27 Jun 2011 Posts: 1291 Location: Germany
TV/Projector: Marquee 9500 Ultra
|
Link Posted: Wed Mar 25, 2015 12:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi,
let's do the complete list for further reference:
_____________R____G____B___________R____G____B_______
Band-SW0 -> C117/C217/C317 (33nF) + C118/C218/C318 (22nF) -> Active when H-Freq above ~85KHz
Band-SW2 -> C117/C217/C317 (33nF) + C119/C219/C319 (68nF) -> Active when H-Freq above 60KHz and below ~85KHz
Band-SW4 -> C117/C217/C317 (33nF) + C120/C220/C320 (2.2µF) -> Active when H-Freq below 60KHz
I cannot tell which switch will be active at 1056x800p@72hz as this resolution is not available on my test pattern generator. But You can read the current H-Frequency when pressing the <*> Button on the Marquee remote twice. I believe it will be somewhere in the 60KHz area. So it could be Band-SW2 or Band-SW4.
I can make a drawing of my adapter, if necessary. Then You can try it out too...
Regards,
barclay66
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nashou66
Joined: 12 Jan 2007 Posts: 16171 Location: West Seneca NY
|
Link Posted: Wed Mar 25, 2015 12:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
barclay66 wrote: | Hi,
let's do the complete list for further reference:
_____________R____G____B___________R____G____B_______
Band-SW0 -> C117/C217/C317 (33nF) + C118/C218/C318 (22nF) -> Active when H-Freq above ~85KHz
Band-SW2 -> C117/C217/C317 (33nF) + C119/C219/C319 (68nF) -> Active when H-Freq above 60KHz and below ~85KHz
Band-SW4 -> C117/C217/C317 (33nF) + C120/C220/C320 (2.2µF) -> Active when H-Freq below 60KHz
I cannot tell which switch will be active at 1056x800p@72hz as this resolution is not available on my test pattern generator. But You can read the current H-Frequency when pressing the <*> Button on the Marquee remote twice. I believe it will be somewhere in the 60KHz area. So it could be Band-SW2 or Band-SW4.
I can make a drawing of my adapter, if necessary. Then You can try it out too...
Regards,
barclay66 |
yes it is above 60hz if i remember correctly.
So in the table above those caps are switched in correct?
I thought the 2.2 uf is used for all frequencies?
Yes the adaptor would be cool to make.
On your other table with the light and dark green dots. what does each dot correspond to ? Dark green off light green on?
Athanasios
_________________ Don't blame your underwear for your crooked ass~ unknown Greek philosopher
"Republicans believe every day is the Fourth of July, but the Democrats believe every day is April 15." --- President Reagan
One Smart Dog!!!
Marquee High Performance Bellows now shipping!!
Marquee Modifications and Performance Enhancement
Marquee C-element and Bellow removal
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
barclay66
Joined: 27 Jun 2011 Posts: 1291 Location: Germany
TV/Projector: Marquee 9500 Ultra
|
Link Posted: Wed Mar 25, 2015 12:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nashou66 wrote: | yes it is above 60hz if i remember correctly. |
60hz cannot be the horizontal frequency. It will be displayed in KHz. See the picture here (http://www.etechvideo.com/pic7.htm) for reference.
Nashou66 wrote: | So in the table above those caps are switched in correct? |
Sort of. The 33nF are always on and one of the three is switched in parallel. Therefore their capacity values add up.
Nashou66 wrote: | I thought the 2.2 uf is used for all frequencies? |
Nope. This one is used at lower horizontal frequencies only.
Nashou66 wrote: | Yes the adaptor would be cool to make. |
OK. Will do. I will make the drawing for three lines only as the fourth one (SW-Band3) isn't used anyway. You will need the following parts:
12 Resistors (values to follow, 6 of them are 3.3KOhm)
6 Standard NPN Transistors (e.g. BC237, BC547, 2N3904)
3 LEDs
Nashou66 wrote: | On your other table with the light and dark green dots. what does each dot correspond to ? Dark green off light green on? |
Exactly!
Regards,
barclay66
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nashou66
Joined: 12 Jan 2007 Posts: 16171 Location: West Seneca NY
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
barclay66
Joined: 27 Jun 2011 Posts: 1291 Location: Germany
TV/Projector: Marquee 9500 Ultra
|
Link Posted: Wed Mar 25, 2015 1:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nashou66 wrote: | in the pic of your circuit board with SWB 4 light on means that it is pulling the 2.2 uf cap out of the circuit correct? |
Nope. SWB 4 light on would mean that the 2.2µF cap is switched into the circuit (parallel to the 33nF which is there always). At this status, all the others are switched out of the circuit.
My display board has two stages: Inverter and LED driver. So it acts identical to the inverter/switcher combination on the FGM. LED on = Cap connected / LED off = Cap disconnected...
Regards,
barclay66
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nashou66
Joined: 12 Jan 2007 Posts: 16171 Location: West Seneca NY
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
barclay66
Joined: 27 Jun 2011 Posts: 1291 Location: Germany
TV/Projector: Marquee 9500 Ultra
|
Link Posted: Wed Mar 25, 2015 2:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi,
I think You were looking for this thread: http://www.curtpalme.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=182553
But there's no formula over there.
Normally the formula is 2*pi*F= 1/sqrt(L*C) Where F=frequency / L=inductor value / C=capacitor value.
This is a good online calculator: http://www.1728.org/resfreq.htm
Select "Solve for Capacitance", enter the values (watch for the correct units) and press "Calculate".
One interesting thing: Previously in this thread, cmjohnson mentioned the dynamic focus coils having 5µH. Therefore I calculated with this value. When looking at Scott's simulation in the other thread I can see a value of 41µH! The difference has a big impact:
64KHz with 5µH -> 1.23 µF ideal capacitor
64KHz with 41µF -> 0.150 µF = 150nF ideal capacitor
At this point it would make a lot of sense measuring the focus coils (which I will do this evening)...
Regards,
barclay66
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nashou66
Joined: 12 Jan 2007 Posts: 16171 Location: West Seneca NY
|
Link Posted: Wed Mar 25, 2015 2:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
barclay66 wrote: | Hi,
I think You were looking for this thread: http://www.curtpalme.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=182553
But there's no formula over there.
Normally the formula is 2*pi*F= 1/sqrt(L*C) Where F=frequency / L=inductor value / C=capacitor value.
This is a good online calculator: http://www.1728.org/resfreq.htm
Select "Solve for Capacitance", enter the values (watch for the correct units) and press "Calculate".
One interesting thing: Previously in this thread, cmjohnson mentioned the dynamic focus coils having 5µH. Therefore I calculated with this value. When looking at Scott's simulation in the other thread I can see a value of 41µH! The difference has a big impact:
64KHz with 5µH -> 1.23 µF ideal capacitor
64KHz with 41µF -> 0.150 µF = 150nF ideal capacitor
At this point it would make a lot of sense measuring the focus coils (which I will do this evening)...
Regards,
barclay66 |
Thanks, thats not the thread. I posted that earlier here. I think it might have been either one of Mikes posts or in the Marquee thread to the frankenyoke thread.
Yes I think you missed my post of the value of the Focus coils. here in this thread:
Nashou66 wrote: | Also these are the coils values.
Thompson from an 8500
Static Black – Red 29.9mH 58.5 ohms
Dynamic Yellow – Org 45.6uH 0.38ohms
Astig White – Violet 156uH 6.2ohms
Astig Grey – Blue 156uH 6.2ohms
Thompson from an 8000
Static Black – Red 28.7mH 58.5 ohms
Dynamic Yellow – Org 45.6uH 0.38ohms
Nashou |
So I measured my red some time ago and it was 45.7 uH.
So it might be beneficial to measure each Dynamic coil to match
it to the exact value capacitor. So red, green, and blue will each have its own cap value.
I also wonder if uH values change once a current is put through it and if that would make a difference in cap value?
So that is the value we need to use. Frankenyoke users would need different values.
They are in that thread.
Athanasios
_________________ Don't blame your underwear for your crooked ass~ unknown Greek philosopher
"Republicans believe every day is the Fourth of July, but the Democrats believe every day is April 15." --- President Reagan
One Smart Dog!!!
Marquee High Performance Bellows now shipping!!
Marquee Modifications and Performance Enhancement
Marquee C-element and Bellow removal
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nashou66
Joined: 12 Jan 2007 Posts: 16171 Location: West Seneca NY
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nashou66
Joined: 12 Jan 2007 Posts: 16171 Location: West Seneca NY
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
barclay66
Joined: 27 Jun 2011 Posts: 1291 Location: Germany
TV/Projector: Marquee 9500 Ultra
|
Link Posted: Wed Mar 25, 2015 3:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nashou66 wrote: | ...Dynamic Yellow – Org 45.6uH 0.38ohms...
...So I measured my red some time ago and it was 45.7 uH... |
This values make sense.
68KHz with 45.7µH need 119.87nF
At this frequency Band-SW2 will be active resulting in 111nF (33nF+68nF).
We can turn the calculation around: What horizontal frequency is ideal for a given Band-SW status?
Band-SW0 (55nF) -> 100.39KHz
Band-SW2 (111nF) -> 70.66KHz
Band-SW4 (2233nF) -> 15.75KHz
Nashou66 wrote: | I also wonder if uH values change once a current is put through it and if that would make a difference in cap value? |
The current itself won't change anything. The only two factors involved are temperature and frequency. We can leave out frequency as it is tied to the input signal and won't change (it's a static factor which can be compensated). But there will be a slight drift corridor between a cold focus coil and a warm one. Therefore it could make sense having measurements for both in order to see the magnitude of the effect. If the inductance changes less than 5% over temperature then it's neglectable...
Regards,
barclay66
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
barclay66
Joined: 27 Jun 2011 Posts: 1291 Location: Germany
TV/Projector: Marquee 9500 Ultra
|
Link Posted: Wed Mar 25, 2015 3:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi,
These are the right values:
Description: |
|
Filesize: |
48.9 KB |
Viewed: |
6058 Time(s) |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nashou66
Joined: 12 Jan 2007 Posts: 16171 Location: West Seneca NY
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
barclay66
Joined: 27 Jun 2011 Posts: 1291 Location: Germany
TV/Projector: Marquee 9500 Ultra
|
Link Posted: Wed Mar 25, 2015 5:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi,
please have in mind that the real world is different to any calculation/simulation (just as Scott said).
My gut feeling is that the real values should be a little lower (additional capacitance coming from PCB traces, wires etc. Other factors like stray inductance, DC resistance of the coil etc.). You could try with 82nF or 100nF as a replacement for the 68nF cap first.
You will have to verify the results. There are two options:
- Scoping the amp outputs. Frankly I don't know how the 'ideal' signal should look like. You may have to ask Scott as he might know. The information from the other thread is not enough as it is a simulation only.
- Measuring the temperature. The FGM should run cooler the more efficient the amps work.
Regards,
barclay66
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nashou66
Joined: 12 Jan 2007 Posts: 16171 Location: West Seneca NY
|
Link Posted: Wed Mar 25, 2015 5:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
barclay66 wrote: | Hi,
please have in mind that the real world is different to any calculation/simulation (just as Scott said).
My gut feeling is that the real values should be a little lower (additional capacitance coming from PCB traces, wires etc. Other factors like stray inductance, DC resistance of the coil etc.). You could try with 82nF or 100nF as a replacement for the 68nF cap first.
You will have to verify the results. There are two options:
- Scoping the amp outputs. Frankly I don't know how the 'ideal' signal should look like. You may have to ask Scott as he might know. The information from the other thread is not enough as it is a simulation only.
- Measuring the temperature. The FGM should run cooler the more efficient the amps work.
Regards,
barclay66 |
Right, then I would assume I would have to adjust the Start timings too.
Scott showed that method in CJ'c timing thread.
Scott showed a cap value 0f 95nf as optimum for 1080p60 I think from that post we linked, Maybe I can try that as well.
Nashou
_________________ Don't blame your underwear for your crooked ass~ unknown Greek philosopher
"Republicans believe every day is the Fourth of July, but the Democrats believe every day is April 15." --- President Reagan
One Smart Dog!!!
Marquee High Performance Bellows now shipping!!
Marquee Modifications and Performance Enhancement
Marquee C-element and Bellow removal
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
CSX
Joined: 11 Feb 2015 Posts: 142 Location: Ohio
|
Link Posted: Wed Mar 25, 2015 6:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nashou66 wrote: | barclay66 wrote: | Hi,
please have in mind that the real world is different to any calculation/simulation (just as Scott said).
My gut feeling is that the real values should be a little lower (additional capacitance coming from PCB traces, wires etc. Other factors like stray inductance, DC resistance of the coil etc.). You could try with 82nF or 100nF as a replacement for the 68nF cap first.
You will have to verify the results. There are two options:
- Scoping the amp outputs. Frankly I don't know how the 'ideal' signal should look like. You may have to ask Scott as he might know. The information from the other thread is not enough as it is a simulation only.
- Measuring the temperature. The FGM should run cooler the more efficient the amps work.
Regards,
barclay66 |
Right, then I would assume I would have to adjust the Start timings too.
Scott showed that method in CJ'c timing thread.
Scott showed a cap value 0f 95nf as optimum for 1080p60 I think from that post we linked, Maybe I can try that as well.
Nashou |
Probably should install sockets where your capacitors connect at lmao.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
barclay66
Joined: 27 Jun 2011 Posts: 1291 Location: Germany
TV/Projector: Marquee 9500 Ultra
|
Link Posted: Wed Mar 25, 2015 9:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi,
This is the display circuit mentioned earlier. Please feel free to ask questions if there's anything unclear...
I don't like it but it has to be added: I assume no responsability if something goes wrong with Your machine by building and connecting this circuit. It has worked for me and can't possibly do any harm if built and installed correctly. Always make sure that none of the board's parts makes contact with metal parts of the chassis and take care for Your own safety too!
Regards,
barclay66
Description: |
|
Filesize: |
57.52 KB |
Viewed: |
6013 Time(s) |
|
Description: |
|
Filesize: |
258.16 KB |
Viewed: |
6013 Time(s) |
|
Description: |
|
Filesize: |
259.85 KB |
Viewed: |
6013 Time(s) |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
CSX
Joined: 11 Feb 2015 Posts: 142 Location: Ohio
|
Link Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2015 1:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
I just finished the addition of the inductors.
Seriously, the difference was night and day.
-No capacitors changed yet, only the addition of 4 total inductors.
->I'm still watching this thread to possibly gear the capacitors for my typical usage.
I'd like to do the HVPS, but can't find a solid list of the values / types. I can match the values by color, but really want to ensure that I am ordering the correct value / material from Mouser. Would you happen to have this info handy, Nashou?
And again, this mod really does make a huge impact for the small amount of effort you have to exert to complete it.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|