Return to the CurtPalme.com main site CurtPalme.com Home Theater Forum
A forum with a sense of fun and community for Home Theater enthusiasts!
Products for Sale ] [ FAQ: Hooking it all up ] [ CRT Primer/FAQ ] [ Best/Worst CRT Projectors List ] [ Setup Tips & Manuals ] [ Advanced Procedures ] [ Newsletters ]

 
Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist  Photo AlbumsPhoto Albums  RegisterRegister 
 MembershipClub Membership   ProfileProfile   Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in 
Blu-ray disc release list and must-have titles. Buy the latest and best Blu-ray titles to show off in your home theater!

Benefits of color-filtered lenses -- measurements!
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly view    CurtPalme.com Forum Index -> Audio & Video Calibration
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
AVphile



Joined: 02 Dec 2008
Posts: 282
Location: Ottawa, Ontario


PostLink    Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 4:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote


        Register to remove this ad. It's free!
I think I goofed on my earlier Gamut measurements. The tool (CalMan 3.7) is expecting 75% color bars but I was using 100%. Of course the Video Essentials Blu-ray doesn't have 75% so I dusted off the HD-DVD and re-measured (see attached). Looks better now but I will try removing the green filter next time.

Thanks

PS - I hope this doesn't matter for comparing gamut but these measurements are after trying to re-build the greyscale from scratch (again). I've been wrestling with this to get the green under control and I've maxed out the CUTs & MIDs on this set! I know what needs to be achieved but I've run out of adjustment range.
Back to top
View user's photo album (2 photos)
garyfritz



Joined: 08 Apr 2006
Posts: 7097
Location: Fort Collins, CO


PostLink    Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 1:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

75% vs 100% shouldn't make any difference. That doesn't change the fundamental color of the phosphor/filter.

But your measurements do look different. Very strange.

My 8500 has 180DMB22's vs. your Barco's 180DVB22's, but I strongly suspect they use the same phosphors. And yet your measurements look pretty different from mine. E.g. your blue is well inside the SMPTE standard, and mine was outside. I suspect it's a difference in the colorimeters, and yours is probably better. My Minolta TV2150 is an ooold box and it have drifted over time.

With your current measurements, your red is almost spot on. The green doesn't look as extreme. Would be interesting to measure it without the filters, to see how it compares to my no-filter measurements.
Back to top
AVphile



Joined: 02 Dec 2008
Posts: 282
Location: Ottawa, Ontario


PostLink    Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2011 4:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I removed the green filter. Turns out I couldn't get grey because the green filter was too dark. Now I can get grey easily but the greens are rather weak. Full report attached.

PS - I have the Sony 07MFP2 tubes.
Back to top
View user's photo album (2 photos)
garyfritz



Joined: 08 Apr 2006
Posts: 7097
Location: Fort Collins, CO


PostLink    Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2011 5:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hm, Sony tubes, eh? I don't know if they use the same phosphors.

But without the filter, your green looks about like mine did. That causes the yellowish greens and messes up skintones &etc.

What filter are you using? Are you using a filtered lens, or a DIY experiment with something like the gels I used in my original post? Maybe you can get a lighter green that will work better. You can see I tested a "light" and "medium" green in my original post.
Back to top
AVphile



Joined: 02 Dec 2008
Posts: 282
Location: Ottawa, Ontario


PostLink    Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 12:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's just a green sheet of plastic film (acetate?) that Curt threw in when I bought the new PJ. He says it is dark green. I'll check out the local pro lighting store for something lighter. I'm so glad that I have a half-decent picture now I've finally been able to watch movies, and I must say the color is not as nice as the old PJ. I see a lens upgrade in my future Twisted Evil
Back to top
View user's photo album (2 photos)
garyfritz



Joined: 08 Apr 2006
Posts: 7097
Location: Fort Collins, CO


PostLink    Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 4:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I didn't test the dark green, but the med green and light green were big improvements over the unfiltered lens. See if the lighting shop has the 4430 and 4460 Calcolor gels.

The gels are a great way to test it and see if it's worth changing. (Some people don't seem to notice the lifeless colors you get without color filtering.) They're not ideal. They tend to blur the image slightly, since they were never intended to be used in the optical path. And they're not the ideal color for CRT filtering. They're cheap and easy to test, but for best results you have to bite the bullet with filtered lenses and, I assume, adapters.
Back to top
AVphile



Joined: 02 Dec 2008
Posts: 282
Location: Ottawa, Ontario


PostLink    Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 12:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The local shop has unbranded gels. I was able to choose what I thought was a "medium green" just by looking at them. It's a lot lighter than the one I was using before, but not the lightest green they had, which turns out to be just right! Attached are the measurements.

Side Note: Although it wasn't easy I was able to get a half-decent greyscale with this one, unlike the dark green. However the result is a very high gamma (virtually no curve left to it) and there is still a red glow at low (< 20) IRE. So there is work yet to be done.
Back to top
View user's photo album (2 photos)
garyfritz



Joined: 08 Apr 2006
Posts: 7097
Location: Fort Collins, CO


PostLink    Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 7:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Looks pretty good! I think that should work. Good luck with the grayscale...
Back to top
AVphile



Joined: 02 Dec 2008
Posts: 282
Location: Ottawa, Ontario


PostLink    Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2011 6:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah, so far so good. I thought I would post back with some more info about the green gel that I bought locally.

They are made by Cinemills and the dealer said they use the same numbering system as Lee, but they are designed for higher temperature movie set lighting or something. I got #121.

There is a Lee / Roscoe cross reference table here, in case anyone finds it useful:

http://www.truecolorgel.com/1%20TRUEcolor%20GEL%20to%20Rosco%20&%20Lee%202011%20.pdf

_________________
Stefan Dr3 - A/V'phile
Anthem AVM-50v -> Lumagen Radiance Mini -> HDFury3 -> BG-808s -> HD-145s -> StudioTek 130 G3 <- Chroma 5 <- CalMAN 5.1
Back to top
View user's photo album (2 photos)
AVphile



Joined: 02 Dec 2008
Posts: 282
Location: Ottawa, Ontario


PostLink    Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 1:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

As discussed in the Joustmods forum, I now have the real deal HD-145 lenses. Thought I would post an updated CIE gamut Very Happy
Back to top
View user's photo album (2 photos)
garyfritz



Joined: 08 Apr 2006
Posts: 7097
Location: Fort Collins, CO


PostLink    Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 5:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

That looks pretty good! I'm surprised your readings are all inside the CIE gamut triangle, though. My measurements showed the blue being outside the blue corner without correction, and similar for the corrected red. But maybe my colorimeter wasn't exactly calibrated.
Back to top
benareeno



Joined: 22 Mar 2006
Posts: 1463
Location: ottawa, canada


PostLink    Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 9:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

gary,

you need to use your colorimeter with another more accurate one...then you will know how much of an offset you can account for. At which point, your meter should be just as accurate as anything else out there.

Which gels are best? the ones from the original post or something more recent? My brother has an rp crt and he wants to see what the filters might do.

Ben
Back to top
benareeno



Joined: 22 Mar 2006
Posts: 1463
Location: ottawa, canada


PostLink    Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 10:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

AVphile, have you defocused your blue? It might help add a touch of saturation...and it will definitely improve the linearity of your greyscale.
Back to top
AVphile



Joined: 02 Dec 2008
Posts: 282
Location: Ottawa, Ontario


PostLink    Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 1:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

No, I haven't defocused the blue yet, because I thought it was beyond help. Would you do that using the electronic focus controls or the optics? Can I defocus while measuring grey and see it change in real time?

Thanks

_________________
Stefan Dr3 - A/V'phile
Anthem AVM-50v -> Lumagen Radiance Mini -> HDFury3 -> BG-808s -> HD-145s -> StudioTek 130 G3 <- Chroma 5 <- CalMAN 5.1
Back to top
View user's photo album (2 photos)
benareeno



Joined: 22 Mar 2006
Posts: 1463
Location: ottawa, canada


PostLink    Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 2:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

electronic focus...i would measure the linearity of the greyscale, then defocus and redo greyscale, then measure again...etc.etc.
Back to top
AVphile



Joined: 02 Dec 2008
Posts: 282
Location: Ottawa, Ontario


PostLink    Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 3:14 am    Post subject: Next steps... Reply with quote

So Anthem has finally released new firmware for my AVM-50v that allows control of the VXP chip's RGB gamma curves. Rather than defocus the blue, I was able to painfully (the interface is horrid) do the full greyscale and this time with a proper gamma curve Very Happy

As I said earlier, with my Barco controls maxxed out to get the greyscale as close as possible, the gamma curve was a disaster (average about 1.5!). This is the correction I have applied in the VXP and the resulting measurements.

I must say everything looks amazing now, but I do wonder what's next... Would a Color Management System (CMS) make a profound improvement still?

_________________
Stefan Dr3 - A/V'phile
Anthem AVM-50v -> Lumagen Radiance Mini -> HDFury3 -> BG-808s -> HD-145s -> StudioTek 130 G3 <- Chroma 5 <- CalMAN 5.1


Last edited by AVphile on Wed Apr 18, 2012 3:41 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's photo album (2 photos)
AVphile



Joined: 02 Dec 2008
Posts: 282
Location: Ottawa, Ontario


PostLink    Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 3:36 am    Post subject: Next steps... Reply with quote

These pics sum up the Before & After. The before shows the CIE gamut with HD145 filtered lenses - that has not changed. I suppose a full CMS would make the gamut even more accurate, but would I notice?
Back to top
View user's photo album (2 photos)
garyfritz



Joined: 08 Apr 2006
Posts: 7097
Location: Fort Collins, CO


PostLink    Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2012 4:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm surprised you can get a grayscale like that without defocusing the blue. See this post and this post for an explanation of why you need to defocus.

You must be driving your blue really hard at higher IREs (which will probably shorten the blue's life), or you're running the R/G fairly low. But as you can see in the second link above, some people do prefer the hyper-sharp blue. Unless you have eagle eyes you won't notice it, but if you're really particular, you may prefer the tradeoff to get the sharp blues.
Back to top
AVphile



Joined: 02 Dec 2008
Posts: 282
Location: Ottawa, Ontario


PostLink    Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 5:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Even with the Red and Green being filtered by the lenses now, as you said in your first post?

I am curious about getting a Radiance as the next step. There is a lot of talk about CMS on the JVC threads but not so much with CRT projectors. I wonder if that's the nature of digital compared to CRT...

_________________
Stefan Dr3 - A/V'phile
Anthem AVM-50v -> Lumagen Radiance Mini -> HDFury3 -> BG-808s -> HD-145s -> StudioTek 130 G3 <- Chroma 5 <- CalMAN 5.1
Back to top
View user's photo album (2 photos)
garyfritz



Joined: 08 Apr 2006
Posts: 7097
Location: Fort Collins, CO


PostLink    Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 8:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

R/G filters cut out some light. Most people will boost their Contrast to compensate, but you could run them at lower levels if you're satisfied with the resulting light levels. If the R/G are really dim, then you might be able to keep the blue in the more-linear response range. But if you drive the R/G where most people do, then your blue starts to top out and just doesn't have enough brightness to keep up. If you have a VP with sufficient controls, you could drive the blue really hard in the higher IREs to get a linear response. (The guy in one of the threads I linked to did that. He has eagle eyes and couldn't stand any blurriness in the blue.)

Or you could just defocus so the blue doesn't max out. Most people see blue fairly blurry anyway.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly view    CurtPalme.com Forum Index -> Audio & Video Calibration All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum